In 2016, Shaheer became the first ever Pakistani to Participate in the International Young Physicists’ Tournament where he provided a visual demonstration of this scientific phenomenon.  Through a practical demonstration he proved that heat gradients are produced when a drop of oil is subjected to heat and that heat is not uniformly distributed through the oil droplet. Moreover, he showed that when electrically charged particles are made to travel through the oil droplet they align themselves into a polygonal pattern that physicists refer to as The Rose Window Instability.

Muhammad Shaheer Niazi recently published his work on the electric honeycomb phenomenon in the prestigious Royal Society Open Science journal

Shaheer’s study is based on the premise that above a certain voltage freely charged particles work to restore balance by moving in a polygonal shaped circuit resembling a wax honeycomb.

He photographed images of the procedure using the Schlieren photographic technique that shows the oil surface transforming into an electric honeycomb with the flow of electric charge. The manner in which electric particles travel through a fluid medium has applications in printing, heating, and biomedicine.

This is based on one of the fundamental laws of physics which states that everything in nature seeks to create balance and regain order. In this case the ions are the main cause of instability which subsequently self-organize to form a polygon thus making the system stable.

Shaheer’s work was inspired by Dr Alberto T. Pérez Izquierdo, a physicist at the University of Seville in Spain who termed his work an outstanding achievement at such a young age.

Shaheer received support from Dr. Farida from COMSATS University and worked under the guidance of Dr. Sabieh Anwar at PhysLab at LUMS during the summer of 2016 where he received full access to the laboratories and equipment for carrying out his experimentation and research.

Young Shaheer aspires to further his research on the electric honeycomb and aims to win a Nobel Prize one day.

References:

http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/4/10/170503

http://www.peacepak.pk/17-year-old-pakistani-students-physics-paper-surprises-older-scientist/

https://propakistani.pk/2017/10/05/17-year-old-pakistani-shocks-world-proving-electric-honeycomb-theory/

This article is originally taken from RT News. Read original article here

That’s what a team of physicists led by Juan Yin at the University of Science and Technology of China in Shanghai found in an experiment involving entangled photons, or photons that remain intimately connected, even when separated by vast distances.They wanted to see what would happen if you tried assigning a speed to what Einstein called “spooky action at a distance.”

They didn’t find anything unexpected, but that wasn’t the point: in physics, sometimes it’s good to be sure. The group published their work on the ArXiv.org, a preprint server for physics papers.

All tangled up

Quantum physicists have long known that after two particles — photons, for example — interact, they sometimes become “entangled.” This kind of experiment has been repeated many times, and involves taking two entangled photons and sending them to different places. Perhaps photon A goes to Los Angeles and photon B goes to Boston.

When photon A is observed, it has a certain polarization, perhaps “up.” The other photon in Boston is always in the opposite polarization, “down.” No matter what measurement is made of photon A, photon B will always be opposite. It is impossible to tell what the polarization will be before you measure it, but the entangled photons always seem to “know” the right state to be in, instantaneously. [Twisted Physics: 7 Mind-Blowing Findings]

As Chad Orzel, assistant professor of physics at Union College, explained, “It’s as though you sent two cards to two different addresses. One might be the jack of diamonds and the other the ace of hearts. When you get the card at one address you know which one went to the other. Quantum mechanics is weird because until you open the envelope, saying which card it is doesn’t have any meaning; it could be either one.”

Speed of quantum interaction

This is what Albert Einstein called “spooky action at a distance.” And the correlation between the photons’ states seems to happen instantaneously. But what does “instantaneous” really mean? That’s part of what the Chinese team wanted to look at.

So the researchers entangled two photons and sent them to two different stations about 10 miles (16 kilometers) apart. In their ArXiv paper, the scientists said that previous experiments had “locality loopholes,” which is another way of saying that it’s possible to explain the link between photons with something other than the “action at a distance.”

The group measured the state of one photon and timed how long the entangled state took to show up in the other. They found that the slowest possible speed for quantum interactions is 10,000 times thespeed of light — assuming your experiment is moving relatively slowly, at least relative to light beams.

Whereas the result may sound like a way to send faster-than-light messages, it isn’t, really, because you can’t know the state of the entangled photon pair before it’s measured; so there’s no way to control it and make the photon at the other end take on certain states and use it like a Morse code telegraph. [10 Implications of Faster-Than-Light Travel]

This type of experiment has been done before, notably by a European team, in 2008. So why do it again? Many physics experiments are performed to check more closely the values of constants used in equations, for instance, which enable more precise measurements in other areas.

Orzel said that even if it turned out that there was some small amount of time it takes for the state of a photon to change (meaning it’s not instantaneous), it isn’t clear that lag would mean much for quantum physics generally. That’s because there are several interpretations for why quantum phenomena happen the way they do, and all explain the experimental results equally well. Physicists aren’t even certain that there’s an experiment one could do to tell the difference.

He added that it is extremely unlikely that anyone will ever get an “exact” value for the speed of such quantum interactions, and, in fact, modern physics prohibits that kind of finding in principle. But it is useful to see what the limits are — to clarify what we mean when we say “instantaneous.”

“There’s a certain strain of physics that people that will say it has to be instantaneous – in fact, if it is faster than light it must be instantaneous,” Orzel said. “So if you can put a limit on it that is kind of cool.”

This article was originally published in LiveScience. Read original article here